When reading Alptekin’s article “Towards
intercultural communicative competence in ELT” I was surprised to read about
the contrasting views of communicative competence teaching. For my comprehensive exams to earn a Master’s
in Spanish Pedagogy and TESOL, I read several books on communicative competence
teaching and learned about the four competencies: grammatical, sociolinguistic,
discourse, and strategic. I also learned
the benefits of communicative competence teaching and how to use this method
for teaching a foreign language as well as teaching English as a second
language. When I read that this article questions
the validity of the pedagogical model whose focus is on native speaker
competence in the target language setting, I was intrigued. The paper discussed many things I had not
thought about before. For example when
learning about communicative language teaching, I had not thought about the
variety of dialects within the English language. How can we teach certain language patterns
over others when there is not a “correct” English language? Alptekin explains, “Only by producing
instructional materials that emphasize diversity both within and across
cultures can one perhaps avoid presenting English meanings in fragmented and
trivialized ways, where communicative functions are conceived as simple speech
acts realized through specific structures, and where situational content generally
portrays an idealized image of the English-speaking culture” (5). She also explains that communicative
competence often portrays and “idealized” portrait of the English language and
culture. In addition, she explains
communicative competence, with its standardized native speaker norms, fails to
reflect the lingua franca status of English.
This article focuses on the fact that a new pedagogical model is needed
to accommodate the case of English as a means of international and
intercultural communication. This was an
interesting article because it helped open my eyes to the fact that as English
language teachers, we should consider implications for appropriate pedagogies
and instructional materials that will help learners become successful bilingual
and intercultural individuals who are able to function well in both local and
international settings.
No comments:
Post a Comment